Tilting Rotary Table: 10-Inch Sizing Calculator

Check 10-inch (254 mm) geometry, payload and cutting moments. Enter your loads, then review fit, ratings and drive limits.

Tilting table moment calculator

Preparing calculator…

Live example, not a table capacity approval.

Interactive Engineering Sizer

Edit Loads & Review Full Results

Platen:254 mm (10.00")

Edit payload geometry and cutting loads; results update immediately. Presets are hypothetical examples. Optional ratings only screen the entered moment and cannot approve a machine or a moving-axis drive.

Presets:

1. Workpiece, Fixture & Tilt Geometry

100–1,200 mm; 10 inches = 254 mm. Dimension only; confirm the machine-specific envelope.

0–500 kg; payload only; cradle and faceplate moments need separate OEM review.

−20° to +110° from horizontal platen position.

0–800 mm; distance from tilt pivot centerline to combined CG along platen normal.

0–400 mm; radial offset from rotary C-axis in platen plane.

2. Machining Forces & Error Bounds

0–8,000 N; peak resultant milling/drilling load.

0–600 mm; perpendicular distance from tilt pivot to cutting force vector.

0–600 mm; radial distance from rotary C-axis to cutting tool contact.

0–120 arcsec; entered error bound (10 arcsec is an example, not a size-class specification).

0–1,000 mm; spatial radius from pivot to evaluate arc-second linear displacement.

3. Manufacturer Ratings (Optional Verification)

Leave blank if evaluating an unverified concept. If known, enter catalog ratings to check holding margin and bearing load ratio.

Optional; manufacturer verified clamp torque at specified air/oil pressure.

Optional; manufacturer allowable dynamic/static overturning moment for the bearing assembly.

Status Overview
Sizing calculated (ratings unconfirmed)3+2 Clamped
Payload Tilt Moment (Mscreen)
145.9 N·m
Gravity 48.4 + Cut 97.5 N·m
Rotary Torque (Trotary)
65.0 N·m
C-axis cut at 100 mm radius
Linear Abbe Error at R
6.2 µm
At R=127 mm (10 arcsec)
Platen Rim Displacement
6.2 µm
At rim R=127 mm
Brake Clamp Margin (Indexed):Rating unentered
Entered Moment Rating Utilization:Rating unentered
Moment Schematic (bars capped; not to scale)
Tilting rotary table moment balanceACG (m)Gravity: 48 N·mCut Moment: 98 N·mTotal: 146 N·m

Payload-only quasi-static upper-bound screen at the selected angle. Gravity uses m·g·(L·|sin θ| + e·|cos θ|); force moments use F·d and F·r with mm converted to m. Absolute terms may conservatively overestimate a signed load case. Angular displacement is R·sin(error·π/648000)·1000 µm, not total part error. Excludes cradle/faceplate gravity, inertia and acceleration, combined bearing forces, stiffness, thermal drift, clearance and emergency stopping. Input ranges are calculator limits, not equipment ratings. Sweep the actual trajectory with the OEM before selection.

Engineering Recommendation: Enter verified clamp and bearing ratings from manufacturer catalog (e.g. Tsudakoma/Kitagawa/ServoRotary), or request an application review.
Request Application & Sizing Review

Pre-fills entered assumptions, calculated moments and model limits in your email app.

Published and reviewed by ServoRotary on . Next review: May 2027, or earlier if a cited specification changes. This worksheet documents software calculations, not physical machine testing.

1. Executive Summary: Four Selection Decisions

Start with a payload moment screen, then request evidence for the complete installed assembly. Dimensions, ratings and accuracy are separate selection decisions.

Measure CG from the pivot

Doubling L doubles the height contribution to gravity moment at the same nonzero tilt. This follows from the calculator equation; cutting and eccentricity contributions do not double automatically.

Separate stationary and moving states

Clamps hold indexed cuts; a moving axis requires drive torque and thermal review. Sankyo mechanism explanation describes one design, not every table.

254 mm is a dimension, not a fit guarantee

A catalogued 250 mm model has its own mounting, mass and tilted-load limits. Check its actual drawing. Kitagawa model example.

Translate angular error at your working radius

Assuming 10 arcsec gives 6.16 µm at 127 mm and 14.54 µm at 300 mm. These calculated angular contributions exclude other errors; positioning tests provide a different kind of evidence.

For manufacturing engineers and buyers screening 3+2 or simultaneous 5-axis applications. High-speed mill-turn duty, automated safety functions and final machine acceptance require a model-specific engineering study.

2. Kinematic Architecture: Trunnion vs. Cantilever

Two axes, separate ratingsA/B: tilt about horizontal pivotC: rotation normal to faceplate
Two axes, separate ratings. The tilt axis supports the cradle; the rotary axis turns the faceplate. A rating for one cannot be substituted for the other.

A tilt axis rotates the cradle while the rotary axis turns the platen. A dual-support trunnion offers another load path; a cantilever can simplify access and reduce footprint. Neither arrangement alone establishes a stiffness multiplier or payload capacity.

Architecture tradeoffs to verify
DesignPotential benefitEvidence needed
Dual supportAdditional support for an overhung loadLoaded deflection, alignment and thermal expansion provision
CantileverOpen tool access and potentially smaller installationBearing load envelope and fixture moment at worst tilt
BothTwo-axis positioningCNC axis options, kinematic model, postprocessor and collision check

3. 10-Inch Dimensions & Machine Envelope

The phrase “10 tilting rotary table” commonly refers to a 10-inch (254 mm) faceplate. A 250 mm catalog unit is a nearby metric size. Neither designation establishes compatibility with a particular VMC.

10 inches is a dimensionR = 127 mmDiameter = 254 mm
10 inches is a dimension. 254 mm is the exact inch conversion. A catalogued 250 mm faceplate is a nearby size with a different drawing; bores, slots and payload remain model-specific.
Table 1: Exact conversions and model-specific unknowns
Nominal diameterExact conversion (mm)What remains unknown
6 inches152.4Bore, slots, overall size, swing and load: verify drawing
8 inches203.2Bore, slots, overall size, swing and load: verify drawing
10 inches254.0Bore, slots, overall size, swing and load: verify drawing
12 inches304.8Bore, slots, overall size, swing and load: verify drawing
16 inches406.4Bore, slots, overall size, swing and load: verify drawing

Include table self-mass, fixture, part, tooling, cables and hoses in the machine load and swept-volume check. Confirm spindle-to-part reach at both tilt extremes. Request a 3D assembly and simulate the actual program before purchasing.

4. Drive Mechanisms & Evidence to Request

Drive and clamp serve different statesMoving cutDrive torqueClamp releasedIndexed cutVerified clampPressure / stateStopping / power loss: separate review
Drive and clamp serve different states. The drive controls moving axes; a positioning clamp holds an indexed axis when engaged. Neither specifies emergency stopping performance by itself.

Compare reversal behaviour, compliance and duty rather than assigning a guaranteed accuracy or speed to a mechanism family. Sankyo describes preloaded roller contact; supplier claims still require application limits.

Table 2: Drive comparison without unsupported class ratings
DriveUseful propertyTradeoff / evidence needed
Dual-lead wormAxial adjustment can change backlashFriction, heat, wear history; use model-specific service instructions
Roller camPreloaded rolling contact can reduce reversal clearanceLoad limits, torsional compliance and lubrication remain relevant
Direct driveNo transmission gear backlashComplete torque-speed/duty study, encoder and controller performance, cooling provision

5. Clamping, Supply Conditions & Power-Loss Behaviour

Brake and clamping actuation principlesPneumaticModel pressurePiston BoosterClean Air SupplyMedium TorqueHydraulicModel pressureDual Piston ClampsPower Unit Req.Verify torqueFail-Safe SpringBelleville PackSpring ClampedPressure to ReleaseVerify stoppingClamps hold indexed 3+2 machining;release during continuous axis motion
Brake and clamping actuation principles. Conceptual actuation only. Holding torque, delay and power-loss behaviour require the exact model and circuit; supply type alone cannot establish stopping safety.
Belleville Spring-Applied Fail-Safe Clamping ArchitectureCradle Trunnion Brake Caliper (Cross-Section)Tilt SpindleBelleville PackSpring ClampedRelease Port (P_rel)Release Port (P_rel)Stopping delay and droop: verify with builder
Belleville Spring-Applied Fail-Safe Clamping Architecture. Conceptual spring-applied, pressure-released design. Verify response time, allowable motion, dynamic stopping rating and interlocks; a holding clamp does not guarantee zero droop.

A positioning clamp rating describes holding under specified conditions. It is not an emergency-stop certification. Spring-applied designs can retain holding force without release pressure, but engagement delay and motion during stopping depend on the complete system; zero droop is not guaranteed.

Table 3: Clamp evidence and unknowns
ActuationKnown principleMust be confirmed
Pressure appliedAir or oil creates clamp forcePressure, friction interfaces, axis-specific torque and loss-of-supply state
Air-over-oil boosterAir pressure drives hydraulic pressure locallyBooster ratio, actual output pressure, cycle time and circuit
Spring applied / pressure releasedSpring force applies holding; pressure releasesHolding vs dynamic stopping rating, response time, wear, interlocks and allowable droop

As a model-specific example, the TT251/TW251 catalog lists rotary/tilt clamp torque separately: 900/1,200 N·m at the stated pneumatic 0.45 MPa / hydraulic 3.5 MPa conditions. Its faceplate is 250 mm, not 254 mm. Do not transfer either axis rating to another table or a different supply circuit.

6. Cutting Force & Moment Method

3D Cutting Force Vector Decomposition & Moment ArmsTilt Pivot Centerline (A/B Axis)10" Platen + PartTCPFt (Tangential)Fa (Axial)FrZ_tcp armM_tilt = Σ (r_tcp × F_cut)M_c adds directly to M_gSafety Factor ≥ 1.5–2.0×
3D Cutting Force Vector Decomposition & Moment Arms. Tangential (Ft), radial (Fr), and axial (Fa) cutting forces project onto the tilt pivot axis, producing compound dynamic moments Mc = Σ(r × F).

The vector moment about a chosen pivot is r × F; project it onto that axis to obtain signed torque. F·d is a scalar upper bound when d is a perpendicular arm or a conservative distance bound. The same resultant force is used for the independent rotary screen F·r; these screens need not represent simultaneous maxima.

Mg = m·g·(L·|sin θ| + e·|cos θ|); Mc = F·d; Mscreen = Mg + Mc; Trotary = F·r

Convert millimetres to metres for moment calculations. L is CG height along the platen normal from the tilt pivot; e is the magnitude of an in-plane offset. The absolute sum is an envelope, not the signed net load. Evaluate all actual tilt angles; the maximum need not occur at 90°. The tool omits cradle gravity, inertia/acceleration and complete force interaction.

7. Bearings & Complete Assembly Load Limits

Force travels through the assemblyPart + fixturePlaten / cradleSupports / machine bed
Force travels through the assembly. A scalar moment screen omits radial/axial load interaction, spacing, stiffness and duty. Obtain the complete assembly load envelope.

A bearing moment percentage is a scalar comparison only. The entered allowable moment must correspond to the complete assembly, axis, clamping state and duty, not a raw bearing catalog maximum.

Table 4: Loads a moment-only screen cannot approve
Load or propertyWhy it mattersNext evidence
Axial / radial forceCombined force-moment interaction changes allowable loadingOEM assembly load diagram at the actual CG
Cradle and faceplate gravityNot included in payload inputsComplete moving-mass and CG model
Acceleration / inertiaDrive torque and stopping loads vary with the trajectoryMotion profile and drive simulation
Stiffness and fatigueA load below rating can still cause part error or wearLoaded deflection and duty/life assessment

8. Spatial Abbe Error & Linear Displacement Stackup

In multi-axis tilting tables, an angular positioning error θerr on the tilt axis does not remain an abstract angle: it magnifies linearly with distance R from the pivot centerline. This angular contribution is one part of a full error budget; it does not establish total part tolerance.

Angular contribution grows with radiusAngular separation exaggerated50 mm127 mm250 mm2.42 µm6.16 µm12.12 µm
Angular contribution grows with radius. Derived at an assumed 10 arcsec bound using R × sin(δθ). These values exclude every other error source.

The Abbe Lever Arm Equation

Linear displacement δ at distance R is calculated as:

δ (µm) = R (mm) × sin(θerr (arcsec) × π / 648,000) × 1,000

For example, when milling a deep pocket at a distance R = 200 mm from the tilt pivot, an angular backlash or thermal drift of just 15 arc-seconds translates to a linear tool center offset of 14.5 µm.

Table 5: Derived Linear Displacement vs. Distance from Tilt Pivot (µm)
Angular Error (arcsec)At R = 50 mmAt R = 100 mmAt R = 127 mm (10" rim)At R = 200 mmAt R = 300 mm
2 arcsec (assumed)0.48 µm0.97 µm1.23 µm1.94 µm2.91 µm
5 arcsec (assumed)1.21 µm2.42 µm3.08 µm4.85 µm7.27 µm
10 arcsec (assumed)2.42 µm4.85 µm6.16 µm9.70 µm14.54 µm
15 arcsec (assumed)3.64 µm7.27 µm9.23 µm14.54 µm21.82 µm
30 arcsec (assumed)7.27 µm14.54 µm18.47 µm29.09 µm43.63 µm

9. Metrology: Match Each Question to Its Test

Separate the acceptance evidence1Single-axis positioning2Rotary geometry / error motion3Coordinated interpolation
Separate the acceptance evidence. Positioning, geometry and interpolation require different tests. Record the method, configuration, conditions and agreed limits rather than treating a calculator as a test certificate.

ISO 230-2 concerns individual-axis positioning; ISO 230-7 concerns rotary error motion; ISO 10791-6 concerns kinematic performance including coordinated axis movements. Their public summaries support these scopes, not the numerical tolerance classes formerly attributed to them.

Renishaw AxiSet checks rotary pivot errors using machine-specific macros and a reference sphere. Confirm supported controller options before promising parameter correction. Agree instruments, uncertainty, temperature, feed, load, travel and acceptance limits with the builder.

10. Thermal Drift & Production Duty

Test accuracy across thermal statesConcept only: no numerical drift scaleCold start → warm-up → duty cycle
Test accuracy across thermal states. Warm-up and coolant conditions belong in the acceptance plan. Flow rate, temperature limits and drift must come from the chosen model and measured installation.

Friction and motor losses can shift a rotary pivot as the assembly heats. No universal temperature rise, drift magnitude, coolant flow or warm-up time can be assigned to every 10-inch table. Obtain model-specific utility requirements and record cold, warm and production-duty measurements.

For a moving tilt axis, compare the actual trajectory with the drive thermal model, continuous and peak torque curves, cooling conditions and duty cycle. If that evidence is unavailable, keep the selection provisional and consider indexed machining for operations compatible with a stationary clamp.

Request a drive and duty review

11. Maintenance & Ownership Cost

Backlash adjustment is model-specific. Secure the assembly and follow the builder service procedure; this page does not specify a test torque, adjustment direction, graduation size or residual clearance. An incorrect adjustment can bind the drive as it warms.

  1. Record bidirectional positioning and backlash before service under repeatable conditions.
  2. Identify the exact drive revision and obtain its adjustment and lubrication instructions.
  3. Have qualified service staff perform the specified procedure with the assembly secured.
  4. Recheck the permitted travel, drive current, temperature and positioning against the OEM limits.
Table 6: Build a quote-based ownership comparison
Cost itemInclude in every proposalKnown / unknown
Purchase and integrationTable, drive, CNC options, postprocessor and commissioningUnknown until written quotation
Fixtures and utilitiesAdapter, workholding, air/oil supply, cooling and rotary unionsConfiguration-specific
Scheduled serviceOil/grease, seals, inspection and qualified labourUse OEM intervals; no universal hours
Downtime and acceptanceService access, spare parts and repeat acceptance checksUse your shift pattern and service agreement

12. Inertia & Balancing: Derived Examples, Not Limits

Rotary Axis Inertia Matching: Direct Drive vs. Geared TablesDirect Drive (DDR)Direct Motor-Load CouplingJ_ref = J_LBandwidth: model-specificHigh Sensitivity to OverhangHigh-Speed Dynamic Mill-TurnGeared / Roller CamRatio i: model-specificJ_ref = J_L / i²Include transmission inertiaCheck fixture overhangHeavy Milling & 3+2 RoughingBoth require complete drive and structural sizing
Rotary Axis Inertia Matching: Direct Drive vs. Geared Tables. Ideal reflected load inertia is JL/i². Neither architecture has a universal inertia-ratio or bandwidth limit here; verify motor, drive, structure and trajectory together.

For a rigid ideal reduction with speed ratio i = motor speed / load speed, reflected load inertia is JL/i². Include transmission inertia, efficiency, friction and structural compliance separately. There is no universal JL/JM limit or servo bandwidth established here. A gearbox reduces reflected inertia; it does not remove fixture bending, unbalance or gravity moment.

Fc = m·r·(2πn/60)²; eper = G/ω; Uper (g·mm) = 1,000·m (kg)·G (mm/s)/ω (rad/s)

Derived centrifugal example: m = 5 kg, r = 0.05 m gives 9.87 N at 60 rpm and 246.74 N at 300 rpm. No special onset speed is implied; force grows with speed squared.

Illustrative balance calculation only: if the builder selects G = 2.5 mm/s for a rigid 20 kg assembly at 100 rpm, ω = 10.472 rad/s, eper = 0.2387 mm and Uper = 4,775 g·mm. At G = 6.3 and 30 rpm for the same mass, Uper = 40,107 g·mm. Grade choice, correction planes and suitability require agreement with the builder. ISO 21940-11:2016 replaces ISO 1940-1:2003 for rigid-rotor balancing; a grade alone is not a cutting-load approval.

13. Five Reproducible Sizing Scenarios

Hypothetical calculations, not measured machining results or customer case studies. Units in the input column are kg; degrees; mm; mm; N; mm. Each uses the unsigned payload equation above and excludes cradle/acceleration loads. No model is selected by this table.

Tilting rotary table calculator run: 145.9 N·m payload moment with clamp and bearing ratings unconfirmed
Original software run captured 1 November 2026 (navigation and floating chat hidden): 254 mm platen, 45 kg payload, 45° tilt, L = 130 mm, e = 25 mm, F = 650 N, d = 150 mm, rotary r = 100 mm, assumed error 10 arcsec and R = 127 mm; indexed mode, ratings unknown. The equations above give Mg = 48.37 and Mc = 97.50 N·m. This is reproducible calculator evidence, not a hardware test or customer result.
Scenario inputs, process and calculated outcome
Scenariom; θ; L; e; F; dMg (N·m)Mc (N·m)Total (N·m)Next action
10-inch reference45; 45; 130; 25; 650; 15048.3797.50145.87Start with the worked example; confirm tilted payload and complete assembly ratings.
Heavy indexed fixture85; 30; 160; 30; 1400; 18088.34252.00340.34Review fixture CG, cutting load and clamp requirements before choosing a model.
Continuous impeller concept28; 75; 100; 15; 400; 12027.5948.0075.59Request motor/thermal sizing; a clamp rating cannot approve moving-axis duty.
Compact aluminum fixture18; 60; 75; 10; 320; 9512.3530.4042.75Check mounting and clearance even if the scalar moment is small.
Tall fixture concept65; 60; 280; 30; 1200; 250164.13300.00464.13Reduce overhang where possible; check stiffness, swing and trajectory loads.

14. Evidence, Unknowns & Decision Risks

Table 7: Acceptance evidence \u2014 no invented tolerance classes
SourceWhat it can establishWhat remains to agree
ISO 10791-6:2014 — Speeds and interpolationsKinematic tests of coordinated NC linear/rotary movements. Public abstract verified; exact test setup and acceptance contract require the applicable full text.Applicable configuration, conditions and acceptance limits
ISO 230-2:2014 — Axis positioning accuracy and repeatabilityMeasurement and evaluation of positioning for individual linear and rotary NC axes; not a universal tolerance class for 10-inch tables.Applicable configuration, conditions and acceptance limits
ISO 230-7:2015 — Geometric accuracy of axes of rotationRotary error motion and speed-induced axis shifts; surface runout and angular positioning are separate quantities.Applicable configuration, conditions and acceptance limits
ISO 21940-11:2016 — Balancing of rigid rotorsProcedures and tolerances for rigid-behaviour rotors; replaces ISO 1940-1:2003. No balance grade is assigned here to every tilting table.Applicable configuration, conditions and acceptance limits
Table 8: Risks and minimum mitigation
RiskConsequenceAction / alternative
Misuse: payload screen treated as approvalOmitted self-weight, shock or stopping loads can dominateObtain complete assembly and emergency-stop evidence from the builder
Cost: integration omitted from priceCNC options, utilities and fixtures increase delivered costCompare itemized installed quotes and a sample-part acceptance plan
Scenario mismatch: indexed rating used in motionClamp torque cannot carry a moving axisSize the drive for the trajectory; use indexed cuts where the part allows
Evidence gap: catalog or standard name treated as measured resultUnproven accuracy or fitRequest dated drawings, test report and installation conditions

Public catalog values apply only to their named model. Numerical examples on this page are derived assumptions, not measured vendor comparisons. Supply pressure, load orientation, speed and controller configuration must accompany every purchasing decision.

15. Frequently Asked Technical Questions (FAQs)

Below are categorized answers to the 24 most common engineering and integration questions regarding tilting rotary tables, 10-inch dimensions and model-specific envelopes, clamping systems, metrology, and dynamic control.

10-Inch Geometry & Integration

What does "10 tilting rotary table" mean?

It commonly means a 10-inch faceplate: exactly 254 mm. Treat a 250 mm catalog table as a nearby size, not an interchangeable mounting drawing. Confirm the actual diameter, bore, slots and swing envelope.

Will a 10-inch table fit any 40-taper VMC?

No. Check the entire unit and fixture against machine travel, spindle nose clearance, enclosure, machine table load and the swept volume at every commanded tilt angle. Taper size alone does not establish fit.

Does a tilting table make any 3-axis machine simultaneous 5-axis?

Only with compatible axis drives, CNC options, interpolation, kinematic compensation, postprocessor and collision verification. An independent indexer may support only positional 3+2 operation.

Is faceplate diameter a payload rating?

No. Obtain separate horizontal/tilted payload and moment limits, permissible work inertia and clamped/unclamped conditions for the chosen model. A diameter cannot determine bearing life or holding torque.

Can I reuse a 250 mm fixture on a 254 mm faceplate?

Only after checking the drawing, register, fasteners, support area and swept clearance. The 4 mm difference in diameter is not the only interface difference.

Which mass belongs in the calculator?

Enter the combined workpiece and fixture mass and their combined center of gravity. The tool excludes cradle/faceplate gravity; the OEM must include the complete moving assembly in final sizing.

Loads & Calculator Boundaries

How is the gravity moment calculated?

The payload envelope is Mg = m·9.80665·(L·|sin θ| + e·|cos θ|), with L and e in metres. It is an unsigned conservative screen at one selected angle, not a signed trajectory simulation.

Where do I measure CG height L?

Measure along the platen normal from the tilt pivot to the combined payload CG. Measuring only from the faceplate omits the pivot-to-face offset and can understate moment.

What does F times d represent?

F is the resultant force magnitude in newtons and d its perpendicular arm about the tilt axis in metres. F·d is a scalar upper-bound screen; a known vector model uses the tilt-axis projection of r × F.

Is the 2× clamp target an industry safety standard?

No. It is an illustrative screening target used on this page. The OEM must choose the required margin, shock factors and load combinations for the actual duty. A ratio above 2× is not approval.

Why can a zero-load case show no clamp ratio?

Dividing a clamp rating by zero modeled moment is undefined. The tool shows N/A, not infinite margin. The physical assembly still has self-weight, inertia and other omitted loads.

What centrifugal force comes from a 5 kg eccentric mass at 50 mm?

Using Fc = m·r·(2πn/60)² gives 9.87 N at 60 rpm and 246.74 N at 300 rpm. These are derived examples with r = 0.05 m, not machine ratings or a speed approval.

Drives, Clamps & Operating Risk

Can the clamp carry torque while its axis is moving?

A positioning clamp must be released during that axis movement. The drive must meet the complete trajectory load, including gravity, cutting, acceleration and losses, within its thermal duty.

Is a spring-applied brake guaranteed to prevent all droop?

No. Response time, stopping capability, wear, torque reserve, valves and the machine control sequence must be verified. A static holding rating does not certify emergency stopping or zero movement.

Does loss of air always release the table?

It depends on the actual circuit and clamp design. Review spring action, pressure storage, valves and interlocks with the builder; do not infer the power-loss state from the supply type.

Is hydraulic clamping always stronger than pneumatic?

No. Torque also depends on friction interfaces, piston geometry and pressure. Compare the chosen model and axis at its specified supply conditions, rather than assigning a universal torque by actuator type.

Does zero backlash mean zero compliance or wear?

No. It describes reversal clearance. Bearings, structure, transmission and servo response still affect deflection and accuracy. Check loaded performance and maintenance requirements.

What is the universal direct-drive inertia ratio limit?

There is none established by this page. For reduction i, reflected load inertia is JL/i²; acceptance also depends on the motor, drive, structural modes, tuning and trajectory. Ask for supplier simulation and testing.

Metrology, Maintenance & Decision Evidence

How does angular error translate into linear displacement?

With R in mm and error in arcseconds, δ = R·sin(error·π/648000)·1000 µm. An assumed 10 arcsec at R = 127 mm gives 6.16 µm. This is one angular contribution, not total part tolerance.

What does ISO 230-2 assess?

It specifies methods to determine positioning accuracy and repeatability of individual NC axes. Request measured bidirectional results for the installed machine and the agreed conditions.

What does ISO 10791-6 assess?

It covers kinematic tests including coordinated movements of linear and rotary axes. It does not make the calculator a test certificate or establish a universal 10-inch performance class.

Is surface runout the same as rotary axis error motion?

No. Surface form, centering and axis error motion can contribute differently. ISO 230-7 addresses geometric axis error motion; a single dial-indicator runout number does not isolate every cause.

How often should a worm drive be adjusted?

Use the selected model maintenance manual and measured backlash history. No universal adjustment interval, rotation direction, torque or graduation value is supplied here.

Which balance grade and ownership cost should I specify?

Agree balance requirements with the builder using the actual speed and assembly, referencing ISO 21940-11 where applicable. Compare written quotes including CNC integration, fixtures, utilities, service and downtime; universal cost multipliers are unsupported.

16. Verifiable Standards & Technical References

Sources checked on 1 November 2026. Manufacturer evidence is model-specific; ISO scope statements use public abstracts. Numerical examples are derived, and missing model limits remain unconfirmed:

  1. Kitagawa TT251/TW251 and TT321/TW321 catalog

    Model-specific example: 250/320 mm faceplates, separate rotary/tilt clamp ratings and horizontal/tilted payload limits. Confirm configuration and pressure on the current order drawing.

  2. Sankyo RollerDrive CNC technology

    Manufacturer explanation of preloaded roller contact. Zero-backlash terminology does not establish an allowable cutting load or emergency-stop rating.

  3. ISO 10791-6:2014 — Speeds and interpolations

    Kinematic tests of coordinated NC linear/rotary movements. Public abstract verified; exact test setup and acceptance contract require the applicable full text.

  4. ISO 230-2:2014 — Axis positioning accuracy and repeatability

    Measurement and evaluation of positioning for individual linear and rotary NC axes; not a universal tolerance class for 10-inch tables.

  5. ISO 230-7:2015 — Geometric accuracy of axes of rotation

    Rotary error motion and speed-induced axis shifts; surface runout and angular positioning are separate quantities.

  6. ISO 21940-11:2016 — Balancing of rigid rotors

    Procedures and tolerances for rigid-behaviour rotors; replaces ISO 1940-1:2003. No balance grade is assigned here to every tilting table.

  7. Renishaw AxiSet Check-Up

    Machine-specific probing macros and reference sphere for checking rotary pivot-point errors; parameter correction depends on controller support.

Notice: Sizing formulas calculate preliminary payload-only quasi-static moment envelopes based on user-provided inputs. Model-specific internal inertia, motor curves, controller compatibility, and pricing require formal application review.

17. Request an Engineering Application Review

Verify Your 10-Inch or Custom Tilting Rotary Table Installation

Send your machine and controller model, CAD envelope, fixture and part mass, CG location, cutting forces and motion profile. Request compatible drawings, axis ratings and an acceptance plan before selecting a drive or clamp.

Instant Chat

WhatsApp Engineering Support

Direct response from our engineering team.